bugtraq - RE: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <046D7511B5DBFC41B4CF3E696EB2CC200201DB41@cdfnexc7.NA.Sappi.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:13:34 -0500
From: "Cupps, James" <James.Cupps@...pi.com>
To: "vord" <vordhosbn@...il.com>, <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

And we watch the meme's collide. 

Dynamically adjusting their data architecture to counter the opposing
meme.

Meanwhile the core data remains uncompromised on both sides. Round and
round we go. Nothing is learned by any involved?

It is informative but is it a mind Virus? 
Is it destructive?
Does it take up otherwise valuable resources?
Does it self alter and morph to adjust to outside stimulus? (uh oh some
people don't like the word morph perhaps my meme will better propagate
if I use polymorph)
Does the information attempt to self propagate?

Certainly not terminal thoughts but perhaps chronic ones? :)

Interesting discussion anyway.

Cheers,
James Cupps
Information Security Officer

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of vord
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 3:00 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush Win
In Florida

Al Qaeda is to Iraq what electronic voting is to the bush election win.

--vord

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:06:13 -0600, Stef <stefmit@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:23:55 -0600, Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu>
wrote:
> 
> > I disagree.  Until the research is credible and vetted, 
> > investigating is premature.  Many people don't seem to understand, 
> > investigating supposed discrepancies in the vote costs millions of 
> > dollars.  The recount in Ohio will cost the state $1.5 million.  
> > That's money that could pay for other things.  So you don't run off 
> > on wild goose chases just because some "researcher" says, "Oooooo,
look at this.  This looks really unusual."
> 
> Oh, yes, they/we do ... based on a comparison with another well known
> "triplet": money spent <--> amount of credible information <--> 
> importance to the United States, when having invaded Iraq, I think we 
> could and should justify an investigation like the above ...
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

This message may contain information which is private, privileged or confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender thereof and destroy / delete the message. Neither the sender nor Sappi Limited (including its subsidiaries and associated companies) shall incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly from accessing any of the attached files which may contain a virus or the like.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html