lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41A6194E.9000801@linuxbox.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:41:34 +0200
From: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
To: Berend-Jan Wever <skylined@...p.tudelft.nl>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, vuln-dev@...urityfocus.com,
   bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: FIREFOX flaws: nested array sort() loop Stack overflow exception


> I'd have loved to CC mozilla about this, but I didn't have the time to do the crash course "how to write a bug report" and go through all that bugzilla crap.

So instead you unleash it upon kiddie and spammer world? That's lovely.

Next you will come by again and say: "I'm still hoping I get to see the
guy who wrote those MyDoom worms in court, he violated the GPL and
spread millions(?) of copies of my (modified) source)."

So, you release it like you did and, expect what?

Some people are advocates of this or that disclosure mechanism, and
believe they are right. I can bite.
You just say: "I'm so cool. I will release this, get a ton of attention
and then say 'hey! They violated GPL! How dare they?!'"

Full disclosure. Responsible disclosure (according to whoever).
Non-disclosure. Fine. What are you doing?

	Gadi.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ