bugtraq - Re: International Domain Name [IDN] support in modern browsers allows attackers to spoof domain name URLs + SSL certs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lysm42gbkh.fsf@gfn.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:07:26 -0500
From: Scott Gifford <sgifford@...pectclass.com>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: International Domain Name [IDN] support in modern browsers
 allows    attackers to spoof domain name URLs + SSL certs.

"Peter J. Holzer" <hjp@....ac.at> writes:

[...]

> The best way I can think of is to make it easy for the user to check
> information about the Domain.
> 
> For example, the certificate for
> www.pаypal.com is for 
>
> CN = www.xn--pypal-4ve.com
> OU = Domain Control Validated - StarterSSL(TM)
> OU = See www.freessl.com/cps (c)04
> OU = https://services.choicepoint.net/get.jsp?GT57083512
> O = www.xn--pypal-4ve.com
> C = US

Maybe I'm naive, but shouldn't a trustworthy root CA not sign
certificates for domain names which are obviously meant to be
deceptive?  Isn't this the entire reason for browsers coming with a
small list of CAs which are deemed trustworthy?

If the holders of widely-trusted root certificates can't be trusted to
avoid even the most rudimentary deceptions, many of the protections of
SSL have only very limited value.

Perhaps some more care on the part of browser packagers in deciding
which CAs have their certificates included by default is the solution.

----ScottG.