[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <010901c51541$89817f30$0400a8c0@p14n>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:39:25 -0800
From: <dullien@....de>
To: "Michael Cordover" <michael.cordover@...il.com>,
"Bugtraq" <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
"Gadi Evron" <gadi@...ila.gov.il>
Subject: Re: SHA-1 broken
Hey all,
> shown that what I would've thought to be the Next Best Thing - RIPEMD
> - is yet another flawed system.
As far as I know, RIPEMD-160 is unbroken, and
unlikely to be broken quickly because of the need to find
collisions for the two "separate channels". Or did they publish
a RIPEMD-160 attack together with the MD5 breaks ?
Cheers,
Thomas Dullien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists