bugtraq - RE: CISSP Test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D58906973BBEBA4E802807EAF5ED0D3302FAE663@OH18CL07VE1.reyrey.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:55:05 -0500
From: "Forbes, Robert R" <Robert_Forbes@...rey.com>
To: "David Chastain" <dlcmacosx@....com>,
	"Vladamir" <wireless.insecurity@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: CISSP Test



No CISSP is not more for management and I'm sure ISC2 would take
exception for that especially when they have a concentration for
management. 


Robert 
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of David
Chastain
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:04 PM
To: Vladamir
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] CISSP Test

To reiterate, CISSP is more for management...If you want a more thorough
understanding of secure networks, platforms -- Go for the SSCP! 

David Chastain, CISSP
 
On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, at 08:06AM, Vladamir
<wireless.insecurity@...il.com> wrote:

>Wow, thanks a lot. I'll pick the book back up, I have read about a lot 
>of "clueless" CISSPs, this one gentlemen I spoke with (Who is a CISSP) 
>said that OpenBSD is easily remotely exploitable, it made me question 
>the integrity of this gentleman and the process in which one becomes a 
>CISSP (Assuming it has to do with through understanding of secure 
>networks, platforms, etc)
>
>What are some of the other Computer/Network security exams that are
good 
>for showing a through understanding of the concepts?
>
>Wade Woolwine wrote:
>> Agreed with Robert on this one. It's pretty much a sure-fire way to
get
>> your foot in the door...esp. if you're dealing with Gov. contractors
or
>> the Gov. itself. Once you have the job, if you don't have the skills,
you
>> won't last long. I figure 90% of the job battle is actually getting
>> through the HR folks who look over resumes checking off boxes in a
>> checklist to see if you qualify - certs/education and of course
experience
>> will fill all those check lists.
>> 
>> wade
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/