lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:56:27 -0500
From: "Marchand, Tom" <Tom.Marchand@...sfl.com>
To: gillettdavid@...a.edu, jasonc@...ence.org, jericho@...rition.org
Cc: sberinato@....com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	isn@....org, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: [ISN] How To Save The Internet


Plus, the same code could possibly be considered legitimate for one owner and non-legitimate for another.


-----Original Message-----
From:	David Gillett [mailto:gillettdavid@...a.edu]
Sent:	Tue 3/22/2005 11:45 AM
To:	jasonc@...ence.org; jericho@...rition.org
Cc:	isn@....org; sberinato@....com; full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject:	RE: [ISN] How To Save The Internet

Jason Coombs [mailto:jasonc@...ence.org] writes:

<snip>
> ... the core problem with computer 
> security is that our CPUs make no effort to restrict the execution of 
> machine code to that very small subset of all possible machine code 
> which constitutes the code that the owner of the CPU desires 
> it to run.

<snip> 

> If anyone really cared about solving this core security problem with 
> computing today, it would be solved in just a few months. 

  Just one of the myriad of security issues that we're grappling with 
are the various rights of the owner of the CPU, the *operator* of the
CPU, and the owner of the *data*, each of whom may have a more or less
legitimate say in what code actually gets executed.  Far too many folks 
have already "solved" this problem incorrectly for me to believe that 
the "just a few months" solution you envisage will actually be correct.

David Gillett








Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.  The information contained in this document may be confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  This document may contain material that is privileged or protected from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, please (1) be advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, or copying of this document IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED; and (2) notify sender immediately by telephone and destroy the document. THANK YOU.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ