| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <121759385-1111604783-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-17738-@engine100> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:04:23 +0000 GMT From: "Jason Coombs" <jasonc@...ence.org> To: gillettdavid@...a.edu Cc: sberinato@....com, Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, isn@....org, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Subject: Re: [ISN] How To Save The Internet Arndt.WA@...ces.gc.ca wrote: > If you're dealing with a large > company or government > department, who "physically owns" > the computer in question, you can't > tell me that they're going to > micromanage exactly what goes on > with that system. They'll delegate > the authority Working in computer forensics as I do, I can tell you that nobody today has the capability to delegate the authority you refer to, except microchip manufacturers. They are mostly silent on the subject, because they have other non-general-purpose computing products, and anyone can pay them to have custom products built. It is the intellectual property decision that box owners make today that results in the absence of the owner's ability to delegate control because the owner does not have a proper means of control. The opportunity to receive a means of control is being missed at the product/intellectual property selection step. This is changing... Sincerely, Jason Coombs jasonc@...ence.org _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists