lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:18:55 +0100
From: sh0rtie <this.is@...il.com>
To: bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: PayPal "security" measures


DNS poisoning could very well be the reason
ISC has details up on its site today and are running at yellow becuase of it

http://isc.sans.org/


On Apr 4, 2005 5:29 PM, McAllister, Andrew <McAllisterA@...ystem.edu> wrote:
> I followed up with Mr Rasmussen privately. I've been getting phishing
> spam that looks to be from PayPal (nothing new there), but strangely
> enough has NO visible attack vector. The phishing spam directs me to a
> legitimate paypal page. I know it is a scam because, e-mail headers
> indicate the mail has come from unknown hosts, and I've received
> confirmation from PayPal that it is a scam.
> 
> I reported the "spoof" e-mail via this paypal link:
> https://www.paypal.com/ewf/f=pps_spf. I got a response back about 24
> hours later.
> 
> I have no explanation for this legitimate looking but fraudulent e-mail
> other than to suspect that phishers are laying groundwork for a
> follow-up e-mail pointing to a phishing site instead of paypal.
> Basically, getting victims accustomed to the look and feel of their
> letter by pointing to paypal, then later sending them another
> "identical" e-mail that points to the phishing site.
> 
> Andy
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Rueve [mailto:rueve@...ioconnect.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:30 PM
> > To: Jeremy Rasmussen; bugtraq
> snip
> > Has anyone here been able to contact this company and gotten
> > any reasonable response (i.e. some real and competent person,
> > not automated replies or replies that clearly tell you the
> > person responding did not even read your request)?
> snip
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists