[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050422000529.GJ29028@ns.snowman.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:05:29 -0400
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@...wman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@....pgh.pa.us>,
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@...ibel.org>, pgsql-hackers@...tgresql.org,
bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
* Bruno Wolff III (bruno@...ff.to) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 22:27:01 -0400,
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@...wman.net> wrote:
> > SHA2 would also be nice.
>
> I think the new hash functions are called SHA256 and SHA512.
> For Postgres' purposes the recent weaknesses found in SHA1 and MD5
> aren't a big deal.
Well, alright, SHA256 and SHA512. It would be nice to have Postgres
support them.
Stephen
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists