[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc718edc0505061550542af1f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 17:50:15 -0500
From: Kevin <kkadow@...il.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Cc: Bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, vin@...world.com
Subject: Re: [SEC-1 LTD] RSA SecurID Web Agent Heap
Overflow
> 29-02-2004 - Directly contacted RSA via all publc addresses,
> worked with another securty consultancy in attempt to contact
> RSA product security team.
> 04-2005 - RSA contacted via telephone
On the SEC-1 web site, they are listed as a "RSA SecurWorld Select
Partner", an honor they've held since at least 2002. Is RSA so
unresponsive to security flaw reports that they do not respond even to
their "select partners"?
I just now noticed Gary Oleary-Steele's Full-Disclosure+Bugtraq posts
of 18-Mar-2005 looking for a RSA security contact. I wish I would
have noticed them at the time, but I filter both lists so I only see
messages containing certain keywords (such as "SecurID"), and thus I
missed reading that post.
--
Unofficial SecurID User's group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/securid-users/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists