[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4300BE0D.1010309@nolog.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:08:45 +0200
From: sec-list@...og.org
To: Reed Arvin <reedarvin@...il.com>
Cc: vuln@...unia.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, news@...uriteam.com
Subject: Re: Privilege escalation in Network Associates
ePolicy Orchestrator Agent 3.5.0 (patch 3)
Hello,
Reed Arvin wrote:
> However, they are a large company. Things can slip through the cracks
> I guess. As to the statement that was made about not following
> "standard industry practices", I could only assume that they would add
> that to save face.
ACK.
From my experience, they are not that fast in developing patches, and I
don't think anything slipped trough - but propably the information was
disclosed too fast for McAfee. Maybe they'll answer next time a little
bit faster... ;)
-- nobnop
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists