[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510031135070.9673-100000@bugsbunny.castlecops.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:36:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Laudanski <zx@...tlecops.com>
To: Debasis Mohanty <mail@...kingspirits.com>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
'Zone Labs Security Team' <security@...elabs.com>
Subject: RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing
PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote:
> Paul,
>
> >> This does not include the version 3.7.159 you are testing.
>
> Didn't get the meaning by what you mean by "This does not include". Do u
> mean whether or not version 3.7.159 is vulnerable it shouldn't be
> conscidered??
What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5
are not vulnerable in the report. So you're comment is redundant. Simply
upgrade your version. Ciao.
--
Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security
CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists