lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11120782.1131396147460.JavaMail.juha-matti.laurio@netti.fi>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:42:27 +0200 (EET)
From: Juha-Matti Laurio <juha-matti.laurio@...ti.fi>
To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, 
	Ken S <ken.securitylist@...il.com>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Is Flash Player 5 not vulnerable or not
	supported?... Macromedia Flash Player ActionDefineFunction Memory
	Corruption


All well known security companies and CERTs not list Flash Player 5.x at 
all, it seems they don't see that version as supported.
Many advisories said today "Macromedia Flash Player 7.0.19.0 and prior" 
are affected.

>From Macromedia itself:
Affected Software Versions
Flash Player 7.0.19.0 and earlier
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/security/security_zone/mpsb05-07.html

Secunia lists MSIE5.01 as affected http://secunia.com/advisories/17481/ 
"Macromedia Flash Player included in Microsoft Internet Explorer", 
default installation has version 5 mentioned.

- Juha-Matti

> I noticed that Flash Player 5 is not on the list of vulnerable software, but
> is that becuase it truly isn't vulnerable? Or is it not on the list because
> it is no longer supported?
>
> Any input would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> 
> Ken

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ