lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:12:41 -0000
From: "David Litchfield" <davidl@...software.com>
To: <ntbugtraq@...tserv.ntbugtraq.com>, <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
	<full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Three years and ten months without a patch


Whilst looking over old Oracle bugs I discovered that a _fully_ _patched_
8.1.7.4 Oracle server is still vulnerable to the old extproc flaw
[http://www.ngssoftware.com/advisories/oraplsextproc.txt]; this flaw, when
exploited, allows a remote attacker without a userID and password to take
control of the server. Why, you may ask, has a supported product gone for so
long without a patch for a serious problem that was made public 3 years and
10 months ago and reported to Oracle over 4 years ago? The answer, according
to Alert 57
[http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/security/pdf/2003alert57.pdf], is
that Oracle outright decided not to fix it. They claim "architectural
constraints" are the problem even though they managed to overcome these same
constraints on newer versions of Oracle. 

Users of 8.1.7.4 would do well to heed the advice offered in Alert 57 if
they've not already done so.

Cheers,
David Litchfield
http://www.databasesecurity.com/
http://www.ngssoftware.com/

More commentary on this available here
http://www.databasesecurity.com/oracle-commentary.htm



Powered by blists - more mailing lists