[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1137097825.25372.16.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:30:25 -0600
From: Frank Knobbe <frank@...bbe.us>
To: Dave Korn <davek_throwaway@...mail.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: Session data pollution vulnerabilities
inweb applications
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 19:18 +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
> Yes he is. He's polluting sanitized data with tainted data. It's a
> fairly reasonable description if you ask me.
I didn't see any sanitized data. It's a POST input, not something clean
and trusted.
> NO! You've /completely/ failed to understand the post.
>
> The underlying issue is not that the user-supplied data is trusted,
> because it isn't, it gets validated.
Where did that happen? I haven't seen a validation in his example.
> The _underlying_ issue is that the
> *same* location is used to store both trusted and non-trusted data, and
> there's no way for the application to know which kind of data was last
> stored in that location.
You're not telling me that $_POST['login'] is trusted data, are you?
-Frank
--
It is said that the Internet is a public utility. As such, it is best
compared to a sewer. A big, fat pipe with a bunch of crap sloshing
against your ports.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (188 bytes)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists