bugtraq - Re: Urgent Alert: Possible BlackWorm DDay February3rd (Snort signatures included)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43d6a9ca.f4.65d4.1706043463@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:27:22 +1300
From: mjcarter@...g.co.nz
To: "Exibar" <exibar@...lair.com>, "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>,
	"Gadi Evron" <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: funsec@...uxbox.org, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Urgent Alert: Possible BlackWorm DDay
	February3rd (Snort signatures included)


Does the payload get executed once it has been copied to the
network share?

Mike

> this one also spreads via network shares, then creates an
> AT job that will run itself on the 59th minute of every
> hour to further propigate.
>
>   very worm like if you ask me.
>
>   exibar
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
> To: "Gadi Evron" <ge@...uxbox.org>
> Cc: <funsec@...uxbox.org>;
> <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>;
> <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 24,
> 2006 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Urgent Alert:
> Possible BlackWorm DDay February3rd (Snort signatures
> included)
>
>
> On 1/24/06, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:
>
> > now known as the TISF BlackWorm task force.
>
> Why do you call a .scr you have to manually install a
> "worm"? Why not "BlackVirus"
>
> the worm moniker is very misleading (actually got me
> worried for a sec). The "email worm" is also misleading,
> because it only propagates through port 25, but that is
> not the point of entry. The point of entry is the user
> running a visual basic script _willingly_.
>
> Just so I know, what would you guys classify a real worm
> (blaster, slammer, nimda, etc) as? Or would you just call
> it an "internet worm" instead of an "email worm" and leave
> it at that?
>
> thanks for the mis-info,
>
> -JP
> "still love ja tho"
> -JP
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/