bugtraq - Re: Urgent Alert: Possible BlackWorm DDay February 3rd (Snort signatures included)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e024ccca0601241052s59da96abs28c9b1157d67693d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:52:39 -0500
From: Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle@...il.com>
To: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: funsec@...uxbox.org, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Urgent Alert: Possible BlackWorm DDay February
	3rd (Snort signatures included)

On 1/24/06, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:

> now known as the TISF BlackWorm task force.

Why do you call a .scr you have to manually install a "worm"? Why not
"BlackVirus"

the worm moniker is very misleading (actually got me worried for a
sec). The "email worm" is also misleading, because it only propagates
through port 25, but that is not the point of entry. The point of
entry is the user running a visual basic script _willingly_.

Just so I know, what would you guys classify a real worm (blaster,
slammer, nimda, etc) as? Or would you just call it an "internet worm"
instead of an "email worm" and leave it at that?

thanks for the mis-info,

-JP
"still love ja tho"
-JP
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/