lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43F94ADE.7050900@securescience.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:51:42 -0800
From: Lance James <bugtraq@...urescience.net>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: First WMF mass mailer ItW (phishing Trojan)


Lance James wrote:
> Gadi Evron wrote:
>   
>> The first worm (mass mailer) to (ab)use the WMF 0day is now spreading in
>> Australia.
>>   
>>     
Also to quickly reply to my own post (sorry) - but a quick historical analysis of the exploit and trojan itself demonstrates this:

Bulk Mailing via a mass-mailer was sent out (basically a phishing email) to lure victims to click on a link with:

http://[censored]/xpl.wmf

This will then make a request to http://[censored]/1.exe which is downloader packed with FSG. Bleeding Snort sigs would detect this immediately from both the WMF and the FSG packing itself. (http://www.bleedingsnort.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/sigs/MALWARE/MALWARE_Corpsespyware?rev=1.7&view=markup) 

1.exe will then download installer.exe from the site. This file in short puts the trojan on the system as %system32%\msnscps.dll and registers it as a Browser Helper Object. (this DLL file is packed with UPX). It names it in the Add-Ins extensions as:

Software Installation Snapin Extenstion (typo included)    

There is no sign of mass-mailing within the trojan itself, it's a standard Remote Admin Tool used to steal data. The format which is stored in %system32%/form.txt looks like this when you log into submission forms:

---------------------------------------------

CompID: 8746B936FCAF484AA9D2D49B60EBD47B1B945D4B00874879853470B023A0B9C3

Ver: 2.0RC49

host: sandbox-1

if1 : 172.16.234.128

---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------- 

Sun Feb 19 18:55:05 2006

URL: https://www.banksite.com/

Action: https://banksite.com/signon

Method: post

userid(text): 234234234234

password(password): 23423423423

destination(select): AccountSummary [checked]

Action: /search/search.html

Method: get

query(text): 

REQ: userid=234234234234&password=23423423423&destination=AccountSummary&screenid=SIGNON

----------(EOF)

It also has some TAN Grabbing Features, Email account theft, and so on. 

This data will get sent to a remote HTTP host (in this case it appears to be http://european-business-organization.com/chat.php)

This is the standard ol' blended threat attacks seen by phishers since '03. They used the WMF exploit because it's available to them, but before that they have used hta, chm/adb, and other object/ActiveX exploits to get the user into downloading the payload.

This information and type of attack is old school, and no mass-mailing worms or 0day WMF techniques were used. 

Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Lance James
Secure Science Corporation
www.securescience.net
Author of 'Phishing Exposed'
http://www.securescience.net/amazon/




> Respectfully speaking:
>
> There are a few corrections to this that need to be expressed.
>
> The language you're using describing it as a mass-mailing worm is coming
> off confusing to some. The WMF exploit is actually seeded on a website,
> and the mass-mailing is used to get people to go to that site. Stating
> that it's a worm is similar to saying that phishing emails and spam are
> worms. I have seen some actual phishing worms, and this is definitely
> not it.
>
> A correction also needs to be made on this comment
>
> "Abusing websites is mostly how WMF is
> exploited, but no much in the way of emails before today."
>
>
> This is grossly incorrect - here are the dates we started seeing this
> activity:
>
> January 3rd -  WMF exploit distributing identified phishing trojan
> January 9/10th -  WMF exploit distributing identified phishing trojan
> Jan 18th/19th - WMF exploit distributing identified phishing trojan
> Jan 22nd-25th - WMF exploit distributing identified phishing trojan
> Jan 24th - WMF exploit distributing identified phishing trojan
>
>
> I can go into February but we get the point.
>
> This same phishing group works in regions, so it's not surprising that
> they are now targeting Australia. They are also targeting Europe as well
> in February.
>
> Summary:
> WMF Mass-Mailing phishing has not been uncommon, just in small
> distributions, so it may have not been seen on the radar. Since the
> public discovery of the WMF exploit, there have been a few mass-mailings
> taking users to a site that distributed WMF exploits to date.
>
>
>   



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ