bugtraq - Re: Re: recursive DNS servers DDoS as a growing DDoSproblem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603081454420.20312@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:58:20 -0500 (EST)
From: gboyce <gboyce@...belly.com>
To: Security Lists <securitylists@...ontown.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: recursive DNS servers DDoS as a growing
	DDoSproblem

On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Security Lists wrote:

> Sorry, I don't see this as amplification in your example, because YOUR dns 
> servers are 100% of the traffic.  1:1 ratio.

Once the first request to the nameservers is made, the object should be 
cached by the nameservers.  Instead of one packet to each server, consider 
a stream of packets to each server.  The recipient will recieve a stream 
of 100K answers with likely only 200K of traffic back to the attackers DNS 
server.

Or better, find some random authoritative nameserver with a big DNS 
record, and then a very small portion of the attackers traffic is used and 
it is less likely to be tied back to the attacker since they don't own the 
record being requested.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/