bugtraq - Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities (Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200603250951.k2P9pjDk003835@vaticaan.Holland.Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:51:45 +0100
From: Casper.Dik@....COM
To: Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
	Theo de Raadt <deraadt@....openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: SendGate: Sendmail Multiple Vulnerabilities
	(Race Condition DoS, Memory Jumps, Integer Overflow)

>So you are basically saying open source free software can't be trusted to
>hold high standards or be reliable or secure if I don't pay for it?

No, he is saying that *their* high standards are not necesarily *your*
high standards.  And that *they* get to define the rules with which they
publish their advisories; many people are fine with the way they do
it so why should they listen to *you*?

Casper

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/