[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <442C8575.5010309@qut.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:27:17 +1000
From: Paul Stepowski <p.stepowski@....edu.au>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: recursive DNS servers DDoS as a growing DDoS problem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Samuel wrote:
| To put it another way: UDP as a purely connectionless
| protocol is fast becoming a liability in situations where
| significant amplification is possible.
My thoughts exactly. This attack is possible because of a design limitation of
UDP (and other connectionless protocols). I realise that DNS is receiving
attention because of it's ubiquity on the Internet, but this type of attack can
leverage any service that responds with a reply packet larger than the initial
query packet where the protocol used is connectionless. TCP/IP is showing it's
age (again).
Thanks,
Paul
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFELIV14qOLghPAuV0RAvrVAKCZBb85yHnwB3+RAOyqvDocbUQYPwCgzSpV
1nnSrOO74gRDzoZSnNxd2jI=
=Rl7W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists