bugtraq - Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 19:44:12 +0400
From: ArkanoiD <ark@...ex.net>
To: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...ell.com>
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: On product vulnerability history and vulnerability complexity

nuqneH,

On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 03:00:30PM -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> >   
> IMHO the biggest thing that makes Firefox on Linux more secure than IE
> on Windows is that you don't run Firefox as root/administrator, so when
> it gets hacked, it doesn't 0wn the machine.

Actually there is only one major difference: you cannot be rootkited (unless
there is an exploit that fits, and if you are running X11 with all modern
software bells'n'whistles , there probably is) .

>From other points of view owning a sole user on the machine does not 
differ much.

(Do they still run web browser as administrator? I think XP was designed not
to do that?)