bugtraq - Re: redirection vuln crawlers breed & security through obscurity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alsb.0604211154.3228@windlord.akallabeth.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:54:44 +0200
From: Thomas Hochstein <ml@...alagon.inka.de>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: redirection vuln crawlers breed & security through obscurity


Ivan Sergio Borgonovo schrieb:

> I just came across such kind of code (php) written by a colegue:
>
> //header.inc
> if($_SESSION['UN']!='hardcoded_UN' or $_SESSION['UN']!='hardcoded_PW')
> 	header("Location: ./login.html");
> //missing else to mitigate the problem!!
> //HTML stuff here...

What about inserting a die() or exit() after the redirection? That
should solve the problem, I think.

> Now some questions and a proposal:
> - how safe is to rely on secrecy of the URL? I'm looking for a quantification of the risk, not a "it is a bad idea" ;)
>  of course http://site/`pwgen -N1 30`/`pwgen -N1 30`.php is safer than http://site/admin/index.php. Any already made study? numbers?

I'd prefer to close the hole.

-thh