bugtraq - Re: Write-up by Amit Klein: "Forging HTTP request headers with Flash"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <44C7E1D2.16048.3B7281@localhost>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:42:42 +0200
From: "Amit Klein (AKsecurity)" <aksecurity@...pop.com>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Write-up by Amit Klein: "Forging HTTP request headers with Flash"

Hi

A reader going by the nickname "xeek" pointed out to me that 
the examples in the paper making use of the HTTP GET request
do not work as-is (thanks xeek!). After looking at the matter,
I realized that I made a silly mistake. In my research, I
toyed with the LoadVars.send() method with 2 arguments 
(url and target window), and had Flash automatically 
select the appropriate methd (GET if empty body, POST if
non-empty body). The exploit works fine this way. When I 
documented my findings, I decided to explicitly add the HTTP
method, to clarify the write-up. BIG mistake - turns out
that in such case, Flash doesn't send the headers if GET is
used (sounds like a bug...). And pity I didn't verify the exact
code I used in the write-up...

Anyway, to summarize - there's a mistake in the document, 
and it's easily fixed. In each GET example, simply remove
the explicit method (i.e. delete all instances of ,"GET" in
the write-up). For example (the first example in the paper):

[...]
req.send("http://www.vuln.site/some/page.cgi?p1=v1&p2=v2",
         "_blank");

This works as advertised, and as also verified by xeek.

Thanks, and sorry for the mistake,
-Amit