[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608032022.54999.dercorny@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:22:50 +0200
From: Stefan Cornelius <dercorny@...too.org>
To: gentoo-announce@...too.org
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	security-alerts@...uxsecurity.com
Subject: [ GLSA 200608-02 ] Mozilla SeaMonkey: Multiple vulnerabilities
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory                           GLSA 200608-02
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                            http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Severity: Normal
     Title: Mozilla SeaMonkey: Multiple vulnerabilities
      Date: August 03, 2006
      Bugs: #141842
        ID: 200608-02
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Synopsis
========
The Mozilla Foundation has reported numerous security vulnerabilities
related to Mozilla SeaMonkey.
Background
==========
The Mozilla SeaMonkey project is a community effort to deliver
production-quality releases of code derived from the application
formerly known as "Mozilla Application Suite".
Affected packages
=================
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
     Package               /  Vulnerable  /                 Unaffected
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
  1  www-client/seamonkey       < 1.0.3                       >= 1.0.3
Description
===========
The following vulnerabilities have been reported:
* Benjamin Smedberg discovered that chrome URL's could be made to
  reference remote files.
* Developers in the Mozilla community looked for and fixed several
  crash bugs to improve the stability of Mozilla clients, which could
  lead to the execution of arbitrary code by a remote attacker.
* "shutdown" reports that cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks could be
  performed using the construct XPCNativeWrapper(window).Function(...),
  which created a function that appeared to belong to the window in
  question even after it had been navigated to the target site.
* "shutdown" reports that scripts granting the UniversalBrowserRead
  privilege can leverage that into the equivalent of the far more
  powerful UniversalXPConnect since they are allowed to "read" into a
  privileged context.
* "moz_bug_r_a4" reports that A malicious Proxy AutoConfig (PAC)
  server could serve a PAC script that can execute code with elevated
  privileges by setting the required FindProxyForURL function to the
  eval method on a privileged object that leaked into the PAC sandbox.
* "moz_bug_r_a4" discovered that Named JavaScript functions have a
  parent object created using the standard Object() constructor
  (ECMA-specified behavior) and that this constructor can be redefined
  by script (also ECMA-specified behavior).
* Igor Bukanov and shutdown found additional places where an untimely
  garbage collection could delete a temporary object that was in active
  use.
* Georgi Guninski found potential integer overflow issues with long
  strings in the toSource() methods of the Object, Array and String
  objects as well as string function arguments.
* H. D. Moore reported a testcase that was able to trigger a race
  condition where JavaScript garbage collection deleted a temporary
  variable still being used in the creation of a new Function object.
* A malicious page can hijack native DOM methods on a document object
  in another domain, which will run the attacker's script when called
  by the victim page.
* Secunia Research has discovered a vulnerability which is caused due
  to an memory corruption error within the handling of simultaneously
  happening XPCOM events. This leads to use of a deleted timer object.
* An anonymous researcher for TippingPoint and the Zero Day
  Initiative showed that when used in a web page Java would reference
  properties of the window.navigator object as it started up.
* Thilo Girmann discovered that in certain circumstances a JavaScript
  reference to a frame or window was not properly cleared when the
  referenced content went away.
Impact
======
A user can be enticed to open specially crafted URLs, visit webpages
containing malicious JavaScript or execute a specially crafted script.
These events could lead to the execution of arbitrary code, or the
installation of malware on the user's computer.
Workaround
==========
There is no known workaround at this time.
Resolution
==========
All Thunderbird users should upgrade to the latest version:
    # emerge --sync
    # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=www-client/seamonkey-1.0.3"
References
==========
  [ 1 ] CVE-2006-3113
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3113
  [ 2 ] CVE-2006-3677
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3677
  [ 3 ] CVE-2006-3801
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3801
  [ 4 ] CVE-2006-3802
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3802
  [ 5 ] CVE-2006-3803
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3803
  [ 6 ] CVE-2006-3804
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3804
  [ 7 ] CVE-2006-3805
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3805
  [ 8 ] CVE-2006-3806
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3806
  [ 9 ] CVE-2006-3807
        http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3807
  [ 10 ] CVE-2006-3808
         http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3808
  [ 11 ] CVE-2006-3809
         http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3809
  [ 12 ] CVE-2006-3810
         http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3810
  [ 13 ] CVE-2006-3811
         http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3811
  [ 14 ] CVE-2006-3812
         http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3812
Availability
============
This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
the Gentoo Security Website:
  http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200608-02.xml
Concerns?
=========
Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
confidentiality and security of our users machines is of utmost
importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
security@...too.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at
http://bugs.gentoo.org.
License
=======
Copyright 2006 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text
belongs to its owner(s).
The contents of this document are licensed under the
Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists