lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:34:46 -0500 (EST)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...us.mitre.org>
To: Ben Bucksch <news@...ksch.org>
Cc: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Vendor guidelines regarding security contacts


On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Ben Bucksch wrote:

> Steven M. Christey wrote:
> > The US Department of Homeland Security's "Vulnerability Disclosure
> > Framework" document here:
> >
> >   http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/vdwgreport.pdf
> >
>
> *cough*
>
> Full Disclosure Policy (RFPolicy) v2.0
> http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/policy.html

I specifically omitted this as well as the IETF proposal from me and Chris
Wysopal, because a vendor is more likely to respond to something from the
Dept. of Homeland Security or big-name vendors, than a document written by
a pseudonymous individual who might be well-known within the industry, but
not outside of it.  Like it or not, the use of nyms can breed mistrust or
credibility questions.  There is no doubt that RFP's policy was
influential and still relevant today; my omission was strategic in nature.

- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists