bugtraq - Re: Ipswitch WS_FTP 2007 Professional "wsftpurl" access violation vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <802385179.20070115010302@SECURITY.NNOV.RU>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:03:02 +0300
From: 3APA3A <3APA3A@...URITY.NNOV.RU>
To: sapheal@...k.pl
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Ipswitch WS_FTP 2007 Professional "wsftpurl" access violation vulnerability

Dear sapheal@...k.pl,

shp> conditions.  However, as the issue involves the control that is not
shp> marked  safe  for  scripting  nor  for initialization, it cannot be
shp> exploited  remotely.  Moreover, as for know I have not proved it is
shp> exploitable.

shp> Unhandled exception at 0x7c840a81 in wsftpurl.exe:
shp> 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x41414141.

shp> In order to analyze the vulnerability one might execute
shp> wsftpurl.exe with a long argument. 

Pretending  this  vulnerability  IS exploitable, what is security impact
from  it? What can you achieve by exploiting this vulnerability you cant
archive without it?

-- 
~/ZARAZA
http://www.security.nnov.ru/
Reasoning  depends  upon  programming,  not  on  hardware and we are the
ultimate program! (Frank Herbert).