lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:05:51 -0500
From: Simon Smith <simon@...soft.com>
To: "K F (lists)" <kf_lists@...italmunition.com>
Cc: contributor <Contributor@...fense.com>,
	Untitled <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] iDefense Q-1 2007 Challenge -I WILL BUY FOR
 MORE

Amen!
    KF is 100% on the money. I can arrange the legitimate purchase of most
working exploits for significantly more money than iDefense, In some cases
over $75,000.00 per purchase. The company that I am working with has a
relationship with a legitimate buyer, all transactions are legal. If you're
interested contact me and we'll get the ball rolling.

-Simon
   

    $8000.00 USD is low!

On 1/16/07 12:29 PM, "K F (lists)" <kf_lists@...italmunition.com> wrote:

> No offense to iDefense as I have used their services in the past... but
> MY Q1 2007 Challenge to YOU is to start offering your researchers more
> money in general! I've sold remotely exploitable bugs in random 3rd
> party products for more $$ than you are offering for these Vista items
> (see the h0n0 #3). I really think you guys are devaluing the exploit
> market with your low offers... I've had folks mail me like WOW iDefense
> offered me $800 for this remote exploit. Pfffttt not quite.
> 
> We all know black hats are selling these sploits for <=$25k so why
> should the legit folks settle for anything less? As an example the guys
> at MOAB kicked around selling a Quicktime bug to iDefense but in the end
> we decided it was not worth it due to low pay...
> 
> Low Pay == Not getting disclosed via iDefense....
> 
> -KF
> 
> 
>> I know someone who will pay significantly more per vulnerability against the
>> same targets. 
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/10/07 12:27 PM, "contributor" <Contributor@...fense.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>     
>> Hash: SHA1
>>  
>> Also available at:
>> 
>> 
>>   
>>> http://labs.idefense.com/vcp/challenge.php#more_q1+2007%3A+vulnerability+cha
>>> ll
>>> enge
>>>     
>> 
>> *Challenge Focus: Remote Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerabilities
>>   
>>> in
>>>     
>> Vista & IE 7.0*
>> 
>> Both Microsoft Internet Explorer and Microsoft Windows
>>   
>>> dominate their
>>>     
>> respective markets, and it is not surprising that the decision
>>   
>>> to
>>>     
>> update to the current release of Internet Explorer 7.0 and/or Windows
>> Vista
>>   
>>> is fraught with uncertainty.  Primary in the minds of IT
>>>     
>> security
>>   
>>> professionals is the question of vulnerabilities that may be
>>>     
>> present in these
>>   
>>> two groundbreaking products.
>>>     
>> 
>> To help assuage this uncertainty, iDefense Labs
>>   
>>> is pleased to announce
>>>     
>> the Q1, 2007 quarterly challenge.
>> 
>> Remote Arbitrary
>>   
>>> Code Execution Vulnerabilities in Vista and IE 7.0
>>>     
>> 
>> Vulnerability
>>   
>>> Challenge:
>>>     
>> iDefense will pay $8,000 for each submitted vulnerability that
>>   
>>> allows
>>>     
>> an attacker to remotely exploit and execute arbitrary code on either
>> of
>>   
>>> these two products.  Only the first submission for a given
>>>     
>> vulnerability will
>>   
>>> qualify for the award, and iDefense will award no
>>>     
>> more than six payments of
>>   
>>> $8000.  If more than six submissions
>>>     
>> qualify, the earliest six submissions
>>   
>>> (based on submission date and
>>>     
>> time) will receive the award.  The iDefense Team
>>   
>>> at VeriSign will be
>>>     
>> responsible for making the final determination of whether
>>   
>>> or not a
>>>     
>> submission qualifies for the award.  The criteria for this phase
>>   
>>> of
>>>     
>> the challenge are:
>> 
>> I) Technologies Covered:
>> - -    Microsoft Internet
>>   
>>> Explorer 7.0
>>>     
>> - -    Microsoft Windows Vista
>> 
>> II) Vulnerability Challenge
>>   
>>> Ground Rules:
>>>     
>> - -    The vulnerability must be remotely exploitable and must
>>   
>>> allow
>>>     
>> arbitrary code execution in a default installation of one of
>>   
>>> the
>>>     
>> technologies listed above
>> - -    The vulnerability must exist in the
>>   
>>> latest version of the
>>>     
>> affected technology with all available patches/upgrades
>>   
>>> applied
>>>     
>> - -    'RC' (Release candidate), 'Beta', 'Technology Preview'
>>   
>>> and
>>>     
>> similar versions of the listed technologies are not included in
>>   
>>> this
>>>     
>> challenge
>> - -    The vulnerability must be original and not previously
>>   
>>> disclosed
>>>     
>> either publicly or to the vendor by another party
>> - -    The
>>   
>>> vulnerability cannot be caused by or require any additional
>>>     
>> third party
>>   
>>> software installed on the target system
>>>     
>> - -    The vulnerability must not
>>   
>>> require additional social engineering
>>>     
>> beyond browsing a malicious
>>   
>>> site
>>>     
>> 
>> Working Exploit Challenge:
>> In addition to the $8000 award for the
>>   
>>> submitted vulnerability,
>>>     
>> iDefense will pay from $2000 to $4000 for working
>>   
>>> exploit code that
>>>     
>> exploits the submitted vulnerability.  The arbitrary code
>>   
>>> execution
>>>     
>> must be of an uploaded non-malicious payload.  Submission of
>>   
>>> a
>>>     
>> malicious payload is grounds for disqualification from this phase of
>> the
>>   
>>> challenge.
>>>     
>> 
>> I) Technologies Covered:
>> - -    Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0
>> -
>>   
>>> -    Microsoft Windows Vista
>>>     
>> 
>> II) Working Exploit Challenge Ground
>>   
>>> Rules:
>>>     
>> Working exploit code must be for the submitted vulnerability only
>>   
>>> ­
>>>     
>> iDefense will not consider exploit code for existing vulnerabilities
>> or new
>>   
>>> vulnerabilities submitted by others.  iDefense will consider
>>>     
>> one and only one
>>   
>>> working exploit for each original vulnerability
>>>     
>> submitted.
>> 
>> The minimum award
>>   
>>> for a working exploit is $2000.  In addition to the
>>>     
>> base award, additional
>>   
>>> amounts up to $4000 may be awarded based upon:
>>>     
>> - -    Reliability of the
>>   
>>> exploit
>>>     
>> - -    Quality of the exploit code
>> - -    Readability of the exploit
>>   
>>> code
>>>     
>> - -    Documentation of the exploit code
>> 
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP
>>   
>>> SIGNATURE-----
>>>     
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with
>>   
>>> Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>>     
>> 
>>   
>> iD8DBQFFpSHsYcX4JiqFDSgRAl+ZAJwMJaZoJ6zwd4m8qZfviOZnNNUVrACgpaTU
>> QkO9IXq+PsC6
>>   
>>> bMKg7j6Dwfw=
>>>     
>> =N0am
>> -----END PGP
>>   
>>> SIGNATURE-----
>>>     
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosur
>>   
>>> e - We believe in it.
>>>     
>> Charter:
>>   
>>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>     
>> Hosted and sponsored by
>>   
>>> Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>     
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> 
>>   
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists