[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000e01c739be$47b2ad10$9d66010a@mbucko>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:33:00 +0100
From: "HACKPL - bugtraq/sapheal" <sapheal@...k.pl>
To: "Eliah Kagan" <degeneracypressure@...il.com>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Ipswitch WS_FTP 2007 Professional "wsftpurl" access violation vulnerability
> So it could be remotely
> exploitable after all.
>
> On the other hand, most people don't tell their browsers to open up a
> separate application to handle ftp:// links.
I agree. It could be exploited in the aforementioned way(but: WS_FTP is not
registered to handle FTP protocol by default). Now I am thinking of
something else. Could we use a specially crafted FHF file to exploit the
vulnerability? I haven't checked that yet.
Michal Bucko (sapheal)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists