bugtraq - Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6905b1570702150717o7ba39eabyf6d22cac23974fef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:17:40 +0000
From: "pdp (architect)" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>
To: "Michal Zalewski" <lcamtuf@...ne.ids.pl>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability

the first one runs in about:blank which is restricted. the second one
is very interesting but still not very useful because it acts like
about:blank. hmmm it seams that the hostname field has been seriously
overlooked.

On 2/15/07, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...ne.ids.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, pdp (architect) wrote:
>
> > I wander whether we can execute code on about:config or about:cache.
>
> Actually, there are several odd problems related to location updates and
> location.hostname specifically, including one scenario that apparently
> makes the script run with document.location in about: namespace.
>
> I did not research them any further, so I can't say if they're
> exploitable - but you can see a demo here, feel free to poke around:
>
>   http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/fftests.html
>
> Cheers,
> /mz
> http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/
>


-- 
pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
http://www.gnucitizen.org