bugtraq - Re: RE: Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070216202655.15957.qmail@securityfocus.com>
Date: 16 Feb 2007 20:26:55 -0000
From: thefinn12345@...il.com
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: RE: Re: Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your
 network?

I wonder if that's the attitude the NSA and CIA had before the world trade centre came down ?

The idea isn't world domination via telnet, but infamy via one malicious act.

You cannot ever really trust code that you don't write yourself.

You can run around with fantasies of world domination via telnet if you wish. Take the thread wherever you like. I don't ever remember mentioning it or even hinting at it.

The fundamental issue in computer security is that you are looking for the exception, not the standard.

You keep replying that the standard is so high the exception will never take place.

This is fundamentally flawed as an argument not to keep looking at this potential problem over the years.

You're a fool. I won't waste any more time on you.

TF.