bugtraq - Re: Microsoft Windows Vista/2003/XP/2000 file management security issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200703122314.l2CNEaLU014080@faron.mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:14:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@...re.org>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows Vista/2003/XP/2000 file management security issues

3APA3A said:

>I. There is no symlinks under Windows. Symlink attacks are not
>possible.

I'm not a Windows expert, but...  There have been some past
vulnerabilities where an attacker could upload a shortcut (.lnk) file
and access files outside of the intended directory.  In cases of FTP
servers or mail clients, this makes symlink style attacks remotely
feasible.  Some previously reported examples are
CVE-2004-2672/CVE-2005-0519/CVE-2005-0520 (argosoft), CVE-2005-2184
(eRoom), CVE-2005-0587 (Firefox), and CVE-2001-1386 (WFTPD).

So, issues *like* symlink vulnerabilities can happen on Windows - but
whether they're under-reported is unknown.  Hard links, too
(CVE-2002-0725 for NT and CVE-2003-0844 for mod_gzip).  Maybe there's
something about Windows API functions that make it more rare than in
the Unix world?

- Steve