bugtraq - Re: Critical phpwiki c99shell exploit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46234FED.9090600@crasman.fi>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:29:01 +0300
From: Taneli Leppä <taneli@...sman.fi>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Critical phpwiki c99shell exploit

Hello,

Gadi Evron wrote:
> This is a good best practice, but it doesn't hold water long
> range. Further, where do you disallow these extensions? In the
> application?
> Mostly what the bad guys would do is upload, say.. .jpg, and then rename
> it.

This is what I do in Apache to directories used to store user
uploaded files:

<Directory "/var/www/html/application/uploaded">
   php_admin_flag engine off
</Directory>

-- 
   Taneli Leppä         | Crasman Co Ltd
   <taneli@...sman.fi>  | <http://www.crasman.fi/>