bugtraq - Re: NOD32 Antivirus Long Path Name Stack Overflow Vulnerabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070523001129.12219.qmail@securityfocus.com>
Date: 23 May 2007 00:11:29 -0000
From: v9@...ehalo.us
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: NOD32 Antivirus Long Path Name Stack Overflow Vulnerabilities

> Although the vulnerabilities are hard to exploit, > it's not impossible.
> There are some restrictions to bypass:
> 
> - The path name is formated in Unicode, so we have to find an opcode in an address with an unicode format
> - The shellcode has to be in the path name so we have to use an Alphanumeric shellcode

What's to stop someone from encoding the path(shellcode) in unicode(using both bytes of unicode/no null bytes)? Also, is there a special situation why it has to be strictly alphanumeric? Because, in general this is not the case.

I've worked with these guidelines myself in the past(http://fakehalo.us/xfinder-ds.pl), and I see no specific issue with doing similar for this, unless information to the contrary isn't included.