bugtraq - Re: Guidance Software response to iSEC report on EnCase (fwd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:38:07 -0700
From: Alexander Sotirov <alex@...irov.net>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Cc: jf <jf@...glingpointers.net>
Subject: Re: Guidance Software response to iSEC report on EnCase (fwd)

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:03:18AM +0000, jf wrote:
> So here's some truth, you're a forensics software company, one that deals
> by and large with LEO, which means you have an incredibly high bar to
> fill, if you're application is not pristine, all sorts of 'bad people with
> good lawyers (tm)' walk the streets, essentially invalidating the entire
> purpose of your tool. Stating that there are work-arounds or attempting to
> sweep bugs under the carpet just exasperates the situation.

It looks like they just got themselves a Pwnie Award nomination. Can you guess
which one?

Alex