bugtraq - Re: Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070921185942.29635.qmail@securityfocus.com>
Date: 21 Sep 2007 18:59:42 -0000
From: rmk115@...landnews.com
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows

I must concur with Gadi. "0day" does not apply. 
How the vulnerability comes to light does matter.

So far, all that has been exposed is "a vulnerability exists." If a PDF which exploits the vulnerability had circulated, then "0day" would apply. Active exploitation is the defining characteristic of "0day".

Otherwise all vulnerabilities would be "0day" vulnerabilities. The term would be meaningless.