bugtraq - Re: defining 0day

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3c4611bc0709251251l3a57365fs797902d46ae07599@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:51:30 -0500
From: "Brian Loe" <knobdy@...il.com>
To: "Gadi Evron" <ge@...uxbox.org>
Cc: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com>,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, "Chad Perrin" <perrin@...theon.com>,
	"Crispin Cowan" <crispin@...ell.com>, Casper.Dik@....com,
	"pdp (architect)" <pdp.gnucitizen@...glemail.com>,
	full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	"Lamont Granquist" <lamont@...iptkiddie.org>,
	"Roland Kuhn" <rkuhn@....physik.tu-muenchen.de>
Subject: Re: defining 0day

On 9/25/07, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:

> Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able
> to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
>
> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
> previous definitions?


Seems to me that definitions, and language itself, is a product of
evolution. You can't just remove all previous meanings. Its better
anyway to stick to the most accepted, acknowledged and DOCUMENTED
definitions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0day

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/zero%20day

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=what+is+0day&gwp=13

Even better:
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:DERnyW4MM4wJ:nujia.norwich.edu/current/2_2_art01.pdf+origins+of+zero+day+definition&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=us&client=firefox-a
or
http://nujia.norwich.edu/current/2_2_art01.pdf