bugtraq - Re: At long last -- Extra Outlooks!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080111174200.GG9300@gxis.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:42:00 +0100
From: Alexander Bochmann <ab@...ts.gxis.de>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: At long last -- Extra Outlooks!

...on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:28:34PM -0800, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:

 > it turns out, Outlook is doing nothing close to what I feared.
 > Basically, the second instance sees that another Outlook window is
 > running in the same interactive logon space, and when it starts, it just
 > calls another popup in the previous Outlook space and then terminates
 > itself (that's close enough, anyway). The good news is that there is no
 > "user hopping" or "boundary crossing" here. 

Sounds comparable to what the Windows Explorer does when 
it is not expicitly set to run as a separate process (or 
started with the /separate switch).

Is there some design principle behind this kind of behaviour?

Alex.