[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F9C0B32C4FFE7147BD0FF6A40BE806E7038A4C@Hammer_Exchange.hammerofgod.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:11:43 -0800
From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com>
To: "Larry Seltzer" <Larry@...ryseltzer.com>,
"Peter Watkins" <peterw@....net>,
"Roger A. Grimes" <roger@...neretcs.com>,
"Bugtraq" <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Cc: "Bernhard Mueller" <research@...-consult.com>,
"Full Disclosure" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: RE: Firewire Attack on Windows Vista
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Seltzer [mailto:Larry@...ryseltzer.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:51 AM
> To: Peter Watkins; Roger A. Grimes
> Cc: Bernhard Mueller; Full Disclosure; Bugtraq
> Subject: RE: Firewire Attack on Windows Vista
>
> >>Roger, you should note that Adam's "Hit by a Bus" paper includes
> information about how Linux users can load their OS' Firewire driver
in
> a way that should disallow physical memory DMA access, and close this
> attack vector.
>
> What are the implications for firewire device compatibility of doing
> this?
Probably the same as just disabling the 1394 bus host controller in
Vista ;)
t
Powered by blists - more mailing lists