[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <486B7422.1921.7AFA0BF7@nick.virus-l.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:27:14 +1200
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk
Paul Schmehl to Larry Seltzer:
> My completely non-scientific, unsupported-by-empirical-evidence answer is
> no. It's because people who use Firefox tend to be more aware of security
> threats and the need to keep software up to date. It could also be (at
> least in part) because Firefox has a built-in, enabled-by-default, update
> available warning system.
I would agree with both those reasons and add that FF updates are not
hampered by the disabling of the inbuilt (and often seriously mistrusted)
OS auto-update mechanisms.
I also _suspect_ that a lot of pirated copies of Windows probably have
system updates disabled.
Regards,
Nick FitzGerald
Powered by blists - more mailing lists