bugtraq - Re: Blue Coat xss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:26:38 +0200
From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij@...derkooij.org>
To: jplopezy@...il.com
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Blue Coat xss

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

jplopezy@...il.com wrote:
> There is a security issue in the blue coat.
> The problem lies in the "Web Filter", which lets you execute an XSS.
> This only affects the Internet Explorer browser. "
> 
> as a result, could jump the antivirus scan or make spoofing.
> 
> POC
> 
> http://www.example.com/file.exe?<script>(1)</script>

I am afraid you need to clarify yourself a bit further. What policy are
you using? What resource(s) besides a ProxySG are you using? (You
mention Webfilter and antivirus.) What versions of SGOS did you test?

In short. Write a report that is clear and not too ambigious to be taken
seriously

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij@...derkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI2H4KBvzDRVjxmYERAmOgAKCyqXv/3s0bFBEFTKvhQ6QFi0hCZwCeLiBD
6FKJxRIGrMITOJZcl+LyeUk=
=GR9o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----