lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:45:27 -0300
From: Mario Alejandro Vilas Jerez <mvilas@...il.com>
To: Jared DeMott <jdemott@...cialsecurity.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	"fuzzing@...testar.linuxbox.org" <fuzzing@...testar.linuxbox.org>,
	"bugtraq@...urityfocus.com" <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
	"python-win32@...hon.org" <python-win32@...hon.org>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] WinAppDbg version 1.2 is out!

Basically it's got some different features than PyDbg and a more
complete documentation. If you have an *existing* project built upon
PyDbg it's probably not worth switching (unless you've hit some very
bad problem with it) but I believe it's better for newer projects, as
this new library is more flexible and scalable.

It doesn't have a fuzzing platform like Sulley. It does however have
some tools that can be useful when fuzzing, particularly one that
attaches to a program as a debugger and logs the crashes it finds,
using some simple heuristics to avoid logging the same crash twice.

Let me know if you decide to give it a try, I'll help in anything I can :)

Cheers,
-Mario

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Jared
DeMott<jdemott@...cialsecurity.com> wrote:
> Can you compare/contrast with pydbg so I can understand why I might want
> to give it a try?  Do you have a fuzzing platform like Sulley for it as
> well?  Thx!
> Jared

-- 
HONEY: I want to… put some powder on my nose.
GEORGE: Martha, won’t you show her where we keep the euphemism?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists