[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AB005E2.6040600@kimminau.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:23:46 -0400
From: Eric Kimminau <eak@...minau.org>
To: noloader@...il.com
Cc: nowhere@...null.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: 3rd party patch for XP for MS09-048?
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138007/Microsoft_No_TCP_IP_patches_for_you_XP
http://edge.technet.com/Media/MSRC-Monthly-Security-Bulletin-Webcast-September-2009/
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi Aras,
>
>
>> Given that M$ has officially shot-down all current Windows XP users by not
>> issuing a patch for a DoS level issue,
>>
> Can you cite a reference?
>
> Unless Microsoft has changed their end of life policy [1], XP should
> be patched for security vulnerabilities until about 2014. Both XP Home
> and XP Pro's mainstream support ended in 4/2009, but extended support
> ends in 4/2014 [2]. Given that we know the end of extended support,
> take a look at bullet 17 of [1]:
>
> 17. What is the Security Update policy?
>
> Security updates will be available through the end of the Extended
> Support phase (five years of Mainstream Support plus five years of
> the Extended Support) at no additional cost for most products.
> Security updates will be posted on the Microsoft Update Web site
> during both the Mainstream and the Extended Support phase.
>
>
>> I realize some of you might be tempted to relay the M$ BS about "not being
>> feasible because it's a lot of work" rhetoric...
>>
> Not at all.
>
> Jeff
>
> [1] http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy
> [2] http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Aras "Russ" Memisyazici
> <nowhere@...null.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All:
>>
>> Given that M$ has officially shot-down all current Windows XP users by not
>> issuing a patch for a DoS level issue, I'm now curious to find out whether
>> or not any brave souls out there are already working or willing to work on
>> an open-source patch to remediate the issue within XP.
>>
>> I realize some of you might be tempted to relay the M$ BS about "not being
>> feasible because it's a lot of work" rhetoric... I would just like to hear
>> the thoughts of the true experts subscribed to these lists :)
>>
>> No harm in that is there?
>>
>> Aras "Russ" Memisyazici
>> Systems Administrator
>> Virginia Tech
>>
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists