bugtraq - Re: /proc filesystem allows bypassing directory permissions on Linux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:49:32 +1100
From: CaT <cat@....com.au>
To: Dan Yefimov <dan@...htwave.net.ru>
Cc: nomail@...ail.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: /proc filesystem allows bypassing directory permissions on
	Linux

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:29:09AM +0300, Dan Yefimov wrote:
> and testing them. Remember the scenario from the original mail and try 
> finding a window, during which creating a hardlink would still work thus 
> evading directory permissions check.

The main thing this does is allow a hardlink-like attack to work across
mountpoints afaics.

Instead of making hardlink you run something that keeps an fd open to the
file.

That said, I don't see how this is a vuln in /proc. Can you not have your
little program seek back to the beginning and re-read the file in order
to track changes?

You can't actually use /proc/*/fd to gain access to files opened by
processes you do not own. Only ones you do (at least in a mainline kernel)
which is fair enough. This means that you can't have user a open a file
owned by user b and then let user c have access to it via /proc/$pid/fd.

Or am I misreading/misunderstanding something? I've not tested all of the
above (no time). Just going off remembered experience.

-- 
  "A search of his car uncovered pornography, a homemade sex aid, women's 
  stockings and a Jack Russell terrier."
    - http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C27574%2C24675808-421%2C00.html