[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091030183126.GE7008@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:31:26 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Marco Verschuur <marco@....nl>
Cc: Jim Paris <jim@...n.com>, Dan Yefimov <dan@...htwave.net.ru>,
bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: /proc filesystem allows bypassing directory permissions on
Linux
Hi!
(no html, please).
> Proc does not need to be fixed, because /proc is referring to a file
> inode.
Well, that does not mean /proc does not need fixing.
> You are expecting transactional behavior in /proc, where /proc only
> registers object information.
...
> And I think you would agree about your mis-interpretation earlier
> if not so
> many people had the same mis-interpretation of the virtual /proc
> mechanism
I think you understand the issue by now. But you think it should be
documented better, not fixed. I believe that fixing it is easier and
better option -- because surprises in security area are bad -- but of
course, if this is documented properly, it also stops being so big
problem.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists