lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002501cae54b$28876430$010000c0@ml>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:16:23 +0300
From: "MustLive" <mustlive@...security.com.ua>
To: "Salvatore Fresta aka Drosophila" <drosophilaxxx@...il.com>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: New vulnerabilities in CMS SiteLogic

Hello Salvatore!

> with very very low risk (you need to know the access to the control
> panel).

I'm agree with you that it's not vulnerability with very high risk, but it's
risk is not such low as you said. Because I have not such value of risk as
"very very low" (my minimum value is low aka "1/5") and for this kind of
vulnerability (which allow code execution for authenticated users) I'm
always giving risk value as moderate (aka "2/5"). Because there is a risk
for a site. And taking into account all those holes in CMS SiteLogic which I
reported to security mailing lists, which easily allow to gain access to
admin panel, the risk of this vulnerability is even growth (in combination
with other vulnerabilities).

> Many web hosting provider doesn't allow an user to execute commands

It's not a problem for serious hackers. Even those commands which allowed on
average server are enough for many things ;-).

> This is not a command execution vulnerability but an arbitrary file upload

I called this type of vulnerability as Command Execution (as a vulnerability
which belongs to Command Execution category in WASC TC v.1, or it can be
also used OS Commanding (WASC-31) class in WASC TC), because arbitrary file
uploading leads to code execution. Only in case if uploading of scripts is
not allowed, only other files, then I used term Arbitrary File Upload
(which belongs to Abuse of Functionality (WASC-42) class in WASC TC).

There is no "Arbitrary File Upload" class not in WASC TC v.1, not in TC v.2.
And in my work I'm using only WASC TC v.1 and TC v.2.

Best wishes & regards,
MustLive
Administrator of Websecurity web site
http://websecurity.com.ua

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Salvatore Fresta aka Drosophila" <drosophilaxxx@...il.com>
To: "MustLive" <mustlive@...security.com.ua>; "Bugtraq"
<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Suspected Spam]New vulnerabilities in CMS SiteLogic


2010/4/18 MustLive <mustlive@...security.com.ua>:
>
> Command Execution:
>
> It's possible to upload arbitrary files (shell upload) via module “Banner
> system” in admin panel.
>

This is not a command execution vulnerability but an arbitrary file
upload vulnerability with very very low risk (you need to know the
access to the control panel). Many web hosting provider doesn't allow
an user to execute commands using the classic functions, such as
system, shell_execute and others.


-- 
Salvatore Fresta aka Drosophila
http://www.salvatorefresta.net
CWNP444351

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ