bugtraq - New vulnerabilities in CMS SiteLogic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <u2r48317b001004260741z2744db16q43824302b656e2d1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:41:34 +0200
From: Salvatore Fresta aka Drosophila <drosophilaxxx@...il.com>
To: MustLive <mustlive@...security.com.ua>
Cc: Bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: New vulnerabilities in CMS SiteLogic

On 26 April 2010 16:16, MustLive <mustlive@...security.com.ua> wrote:
>
> It's not a problem for serious hackers. Even those commands which allowed on
> average server are enough for many things ;-).

So what? Also a SQL Injection vulnerability may be used to write a
file on the system to execute commands, but it isn't a remote commands
execution vulnerability. The your is not a command execution
vulnerability because there aren't injection on a command execution's
function, such as system(). If you can upload a file not allowed by
the vulnerable script, you can than upload a malicious file that can
be used to execute commands or other operations on the target server,
but it isn't a direct command execution vulnerability, understand? The
my is only a clarification.

-- 
Salvatore Fresta aka Drosophila
http://www.salvatorefresta.net
CWNP444351