bugtraq - Re: Perfect PDF products distributed with vulnerable MSVC++ libraries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2D91B512534D4D45A21DA88DF8AB90E9@localhost>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:36:48 +0200
From: "Stefan Kanthak" <stefan.kanthak@...go.de>
To: "Brad Hards" <bradh@...gmouth.net>, <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Perfect PDF products distributed with vulnerable MSVC++ libraries

"Brad Hards" <bradh@...gmouth.net> wrote:

> On Sunday 19 June 2011 11:37:33 Stefan Kanthak wrote:
>> soft Xpansion <www.soft-xpansion.com> distributes their (freeware)
>> products "Perfect PDF 7 Master" and "Perfect PDF 7 Reader" (the
>> current files are dated 2011-05-10) with OUTDATED and VULNERABLE
>> Visual C++ 2008 runtime libraries VCRedist_x86.exe/VCRedist_x64.exe
>> version 9.0.30729.17 of 2008-08-08.
>> 
>> These libraries have been updated since then at least twice due to
>> vulnerabilities, see
>> <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS09-035.mspx>
>> and
>> <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS11-025.mspx>
> Did you check if these vulnerabilities be exploited via this product?

No. I would have mentioned them explicitly then.

> I'm not suggesting that its OK to distribute outdated libs, just to
> understand the risk a little more.

1. Software that is distributed with such outdated libraries is VERY
   likely compiled/produced in an outdated development environment
   TOO, so there may be more errors/vulnerabilities lurking.

2. <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS11-025.mspx>

| In the case where a system has no MFC applications currently installed
| but does have the vulnerable Visual Studio or Visual C++ runtimes
| installed, Microsoft recommends that users install this update as a
| defense-in-depth measure, in case of an attack vector being introduced
| or becoming known at a later time.

   For the above products Microsofts advice is like a self-fullfilling
   prophecy:-(

3. Even if the current MSVC++ runtime is installed later (via Windows
   Update, for example), the vulnerable MSVC++ runtime(s) remain
   installed (side-by-side).
   You have to (and should!) remove them manually to get rid of them
   completely!

Stefan