[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201205152240.q4FMe8g0028504@sf01web2.securityfocus.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 22:40:08 GMT
From: pi3@....com.pl
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: The story of the Linux kernel 3.x...
The story of the Linux kernel 3.x...
In 2005 everybody was exited about possibility of bypass ASLR on all
Linux 2.6 kernels because of the new concept called VDSO (Virtual
Dynamic Shared Object). More information about this story can be found
at the following link:
http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/08/linux-gate/
In short, VDSO was mmap'ed by the kernel in the user space memory always
at the same fixed address. Because of that well-known technique
ret-to-libc (or as some ppl prefer ROP) was possible and effective
to bypass existing security mitigation in the system.
.. 6 years later Linus Torvalds announced the release of the new kernel
version - 3.x! Now, guess what happened...
pi3-darkstar new # uname -r
3.2.12-gentoo
pi3-darkstar new # cat /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
2
pi3-darkstar new # cat /proc/self/maps|tail -2
bfa81000-bfaa2000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
ffffe000-fffff000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso]
pi3-darkstar new # cat /proc/self/maps|tail -2
bfd5e000-bfd7f000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack]
ffffe000-fffff000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso]
pi3-darkstar new # ldd /bin/ls|head -1
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
pi3-darkstar new # ldd /bin/ls|head -1
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
pi3-darkstar new #
I'm not using
dd if=/proc/self/mem of=linux-gate.dso bs=4096 skip=1048574 count=1
because I'm lame :)
pi3-darkstar new # echo "main(){}">dupa.c
pi3-darkstar new # gcc dupa.c -o dupa
pi3-darkstar new # gdb -q ./dupa
Reading symbols from /root/priv/projekty/pro-police/new/dupa...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x80483b7
(gdb) r
Starting program: /root/priv/projekty/pro-police/new/dupa
Breakpoint 1, 0x080483b7 in main ()
(gdb) dump binary memory test_dump.bin 0xffffe000 0xfffff000
(gdb) quit
A debugging session is active.
Inferior 1 [process 20117] will be killed.
Quit anyway? (y or n) y
pi3-darkstar new # file test_dump.bin
test_dump.bin: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
pi3-darkstar new # objdump -T ./test_dump.bin
./test_dump.bin: file format elf32-i386
DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE:
ffffe414 g DF .text 00000014 LINUX_2.5 __kernel_vsyscall
00000000 g DO *ABS* 00000000 LINUX_2.5 LINUX_2.5
ffffe40c g DF .text 00000008 LINUX_2.5 __kernel_rt_sigreturn
ffffe400 g DF .text 00000009 LINUX_2.5 __kernel_sigreturn
pi3-darkstar new # readelf -h ./test_dump.bin
ELF Header:
Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Class: ELF32
Data: 2's complement, little endian
Version: 1 (current)
OS/ABI: UNIX - System V
ABI Version: 0
Type: DYN (Shared object file)
Machine: Intel 80386
Version: 0x1
Entry point address: 0xffffe414
Start of program headers: 52 (bytes into file)
Start of section headers: 1172 (bytes into file)
Flags: 0x0
Size of this header: 52 (bytes)
Size of program headers: 32 (bytes)
Number of program headers: 4
Size of section headers: 40 (bytes)
Number of section headers: 12
pi3-darkstar new # objdump -f ./test_dump.bin
./test_dump.bin: file format elf32-i386
architecture: i386, flags 0x00000150:
HAS_SYMS, DYNAMIC, D_PAGED
start address 0xffffe414
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
pi3-darkstar new # objdump -d --start-address=0xffffe414 ./test_dump.bin
./test_dump.bin: file format elf32-i386
Disassembly of section .text:
ffffe414 <__kernel_vsyscall>:
ffffe414: 51 push %ecx
ffffe415: 52 push %edx
ffffe416: 55 push %ebp
ffffe417: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
ffffe419: 0f 34 sysenter
ffffe41b: 90 nop
ffffe41c: 90 nop
ffffe41d: 90 nop
ffffe41e: 90 nop
ffffe41f: 90 nop
ffffe420: 90 nop
ffffe421: 90 nop
ffffe422: cd 80 int $0x80
<--------------------- Nice oldschool pop-ret :) ---------------------->
ffffe424: 5d pop %ebp
ffffe425: 5a pop %edx
ffffe426: 59 pop %ecx
ffffe427: c3 ret
pi3-darkstar new #
If you look at the process memory layout and analyse every bytes from
this address range you can find some useful instruction not only that
which I listed in this lame write-up.
Btw. I wonder why no-one point this out before...
Btw2. Go and write reliable exploit for kernel 3.x ;p
Best regards,
Adam Zabrocki
--
http://pi3.com.pl
http://blog.pi3.com.pl/?p=332
Powered by blists - more mailing lists